Highlights of the 81 vetoes issued Monday by Gov. Jim Doyle to …
Highlights of the 81 vetoes issued Monday by Gov. Jim Doyle to …
Gov. Jim Doyle is using his veto power to lower the amount of …
Gov. Jim Doyle is vetoing 81 items in the two-year $62 billion …
Updated: Monday, 29 Jun 2009, 4:07 PM CDT
Published : Monday, 29 Jun 2009, 11:16 AM CDT
MADISON, Wis. (AP) - Gov. Jim Doyle left most of the $62 billion state budget alone
before signing it into law Monday.
The Democratic governor cut about $10 million in spending
with his 81 vetoes, which touch on some of the more contentious
parts of the two-year spending plan. But given that Democrats
control the Legislature and worked out the deal in consultation
with Doyle's office, most of the vetoes were relatively minor.
The dollar amount vetoed was just 0.017 percent of the total
budget.
Democratic lawmakers and Doyle said they did not expect any
override votes.
Doyle pushed lawmakers to act quickly so the cuts and tax
increases could start soon to address Wisconsin's projected $6.6
billion budget shortfall, the highest in state history.
Wisconsin also faced losing about $89 million in federal
money if the budget wasn't enacted by Wednesday, the start of the
new budget year. Monday's signing marked the first time since 1977
that a state budget was enacted on time.
Doyle, at a signing ceremony outside his residence along Lake
Mendota, touted that the budget contained no general sales, income
or payroll tax increases.
He said priorities he laid out when he introduced the budget
in February were met, including protecting the middle class and
making deeps cuts along with targeted tax and fee increases while
protecting education, local services and health care access.
Republicans have assailed the budget for its $2.1 billion in
tax and fee increases, calling it an irresponsible plan that will
hurt businesses and other taxpayers. They called for deeper cuts to
balance the budget but were powerless to stop Democrats who hold
majorities in both the state Senate and Assembly.
Assembly Minority Leader Jeff Fitzgerald, R-Horicon, on
Monday called it "a terrible budget riddled with pork projects,
job-killing special interest policy items and billions in new
spending."
His brother, Senate Minority Leader Scott Fitzgerald,
R-Juneau, faulted Doyle for not using his veto power to remove
items from the budget that were largely policy related and didn't
have anything to do with balancing the state's books.
"The Legislature's main priority should be growing jobs and
reducing the tax burden on Wisconsin working families," Scott
Fitzgerald said. "Instead, the Democrats are haphazardly increasing
taxes and fees that will harm our state and threaten its future
financial and economic health."
Untouched by Doyle's vetoes were a new 75-cent tax on
cigarettes and a 75-cent monthly fee on all phone users. Other
Doyle initiatives, including a higher income tax bracket for
households earning more than $300,000 a year and lowered capital
gains exemptions from 60 percent to 30 percent, also remained in
tact.
Doyle made some changes with his veto power, including:
- Removing a proposed Milwaukee Transit Authority that could
have levied up to a 0.65 cent sales tax increase to pay for
transportation improvements and other county expenses.
- Lowering the money available each year under a revamped
film tax credit program from $1.5 million to $500,000.
- Eliminating money for a new, fourth staff position in the
lieutenant governor's office.
- Doing away with proposed higher increases in how much
liability insurance car owners must carry. The minimums would rise
next year, but additional hikes in 2011 and 2012 would not occur.
The spending plan includes 6 percent cuts to most state
agencies. It will result in all state employees being furloughed
for 16 days over the next two years, force about 1,400 to be laid
off and rescind 2 percent pay increases.
It does not include a new tax on oil companies that Doyle had
proposed, which was removed by the Legislature. Doyle said he still
supported the idea, despite questions over how it could be
constitutionally implemented.